Footsteps on the Mountain blog

Connect
Follow me on TwitterLike me on FacebookFollow me on TumblrSubscribe to my RSS feeds
Watch my YouTube channelFollow me on Google+See my Amazon profileSee my Goodreads profile

Footsteps on the Mountain

September 25, 2013 4:08 pm, by Mark Horrell<< Return to blog home

Summit day on Manaslu: what’s it really like?

Variable snow conditions mean summits of mountains can differ from year to year. One mountain whose summit is unrecognisable from when it was first climbed in 1956 is Manaslu in Nepal, the eighth highest mountain in the world and one of the 8000m peaks. Its summit has changed so much in the last half century that modern mountaineers could almost be climbing a different mountain from those pioneering first ascenders.

Commercial climbers on Manaslu's fore-summit (Photo: Mingma Sherpa / Jagged Globe)

Commercial climbers on Manaslu’s fore-summit (Photo: Mingma Sherpa / Jagged Globe)

This occurred to me as I was reading the Japanese climber Toshio Imanishi’s account of the first ascent. The 8163m mountain has a colourful history I have talked about previously in this blog, but its summit has been a puzzle to me for a few years. A friend of mine, Bunter, reached the fore-summit as part of a commercial group with the mountaineering company Jagged Globe in 2008. His summit photo showed half a dozen people sitting on top of a rounded snow dome. They had stopped there because beyond it was an exposed ridge which would only have been safe for less experienced climbers with fixed ropes in place. Imanishi’s summit photo showed a shattered rock tower barely large enough for a single person, but just how exposed was the ridge which divided the two summits?

When I climbed the mountain myself in 2011, what I found was something entirely unexpected. It tallied neither with Imanishi’s rock tower nor Bunter’s fore-summit, so what on earth had happened? I hoped by reading Imanishi’s account I could unlock the mystery, but the route he described was unrecognisable from what I experienced. I had to read it several times before I could piece together the facts, and even then I could not be certain.

Was it possible either he or I had recalled the features only vaguely in our exhausted state? Possibly, but it wasn’t just his description which diverged from mine; his photos were very different too. And yet, there is no doubt that we both reached the summit.

How could this be? Let’s start with the photos. Here is Imanishi’s photo of Gyaltsen Norbu Sherpa standing on the summit in 1956. I have compared it with American climber Ed Viestur’s photo of the Finn Veikka Gustafsson standing on the summit in 1999.

On the left is Gyaltsen Norbu Sherpa standing on the summit of Manaslu in 1956 (Photo: Toshio Imanishi), and on the right is Veikka Gustafsson, there in 1999 (Photo: Ed Viesturs)

On the left is Gyaltsen Norbu Sherpa standing on the summit of Manaslu in 1956 (Photo: Toshio Imanishi), and on the right is Veikka Gustafsson, there in 1999 (Photo: Ed Viesturs)

There is no question both men are standing on the same rocky summit. You can even see the distinct line which divides the lighter limestone with dark granite rock a couple of metres from the top. The summit hadn’t changed at all in 43 years, but compare it with my own summit photo from 2011, and perhaps even more starkly the summit photo of the Russian mountaineer turned kick-boxer Mila Mikhanovskaia, taken in 2012.

On the left is me on the summit of Manaslu in 2011 (Photo: Mark Horrell) and on the right is Mila Mikhanovskaia with Pasang Wongchu Sherpa, there in 2012 (Photo: Mila Mikhanovskaia)

On the left is me on the summit of Manaslu in 2011 (Photo: Mark Horrell) and on the right is Mila Mikhanovskaia with Pasang Wongchu Sherpa, there in 2012 (Photo: Mila Mikhanovskaia)

As you can see, there’s been a wee bit more snow in the intervening years. To even tell it’s the same mountain it’s necessary to take a step back and view the panorama behind. This is best done using Imanishi’s photo of an empty summit showing three peaks – Ganesh, Himalchuli and Peak 29 – on the horizon behind. If you look carefully you will see the profile of Peak 29 matches the one seen behind my left shoulder in my own summit photo.

The summit of Manaslu in 1956, with Ganesh, Himalchuli and Peak 29 on the horizon behind (Photo: Toshio Imanishi)

The summit of Manaslu in 1956, with Ganesh, Himalchuli and Peak 29 on the horizon behind (Photo: Toshio Imanishi)

So much for the photos, how about the route description? From Camp 4 at 7450m, Manaslu’s summit route is extremely straightforward. Here is the view from camp, and you can see the 8163m main summit in the centre, with Manaslu’s 7992m East Pinnacle on the left. From here it looks like just one easy snow slope all the way to the summit.

At Camp 4 beneath the East Pinnacle and main summit

At Camp 4 beneath the East Pinnacle and main summit

This isn’t far from the truth. To flesh the description out a little more, I would say the summit route from Camp 4 roughly consists of three plateaus, each followed by a steep snow bank a hundred metres or so in height. Each plateau slopes upwards at a slightly steeper angle than the plateau preceding it. The third “plateau” is actually more of a steep snow slope, but it’s a good deal less steep than the snow bank beyond it that leads up to the summit crown.

While today’s summit assault camp is pitched at 7450m at the bottom of the first plateau, Toshio Imanishi and Gyaltsen Norbu Sherpa actually pitched theirs at 7800m, leaving them only a little over 300m to climb to reach the summit. I would estimate this would put them on the second plateau, roughly where Chongba Sherpa is standing in the following photo.

Chongba on the second plateau, with the summit behind

Chongba on the second plateau, with the summit behind

From here the route to the summit looks blindingly obvious, straight up the snow slope behind Chongba, and for us it was, not least because the sky is absolutely clear. Routes can seem very different under cloudy conditions, and none more so that those which cross relatively featureless snow plateaus. In 1972 Reinhold Messner lost two fellow climbers, Franz Jäger and Andi Schlick very close to this spot when a storm blew up as they were descending from the summit, and neither were ever seen again. But this wasn’t the case for Imanishi and Gyaltsen. Imanishi states quite explicitly that “the day was absolutely fine and windless”.

So how could their ascent be so very different from my own? Well, the first thing to remember is there was far less snow, and the snow bank between the second and third plateaus may well have been guarded by a rock band (by which I mean a difficult section of rock, as opposed to five men with guitars and a drum kit). We also know that the area between the East Pinnacle on the left and the main summit was not soft snow, like it was for us but a much more difficult surface:

“The snow face extending from the pinnacle appeared to be of blue ice, when seen immediately after leaving camp. However, we found a break in the face and moved towards it. We felt relieved: if such blue ice had continued to the summit, the ascent would have been quite impossible – if we had slipped, we would surely have plunged into a valley a thousand feet deep on the west side.”
Toshio Imanishi, The First Assault Party

We can see from this that instead of heading straight up the middle of the plateau like we did, the blue ice kept them to the right, so far to the right, in fact, that they would have been in danger of toppling off the edge into the Marsyangdi Valley on Manaslu’s western side. They probably ended up working their way up the rocks behind Chongba’s left shoulder in the above photo.

Above this they reached a wide snowfield – the third plateau. Imanishi continues:

Looking up the third plateau to the summit crown

Looking up the third plateau to the summit crown

We slowly climbed the snow face which undulated gently and was crevassed. On the right we saw two white peaks … Suddenly Gyaltsen called to me. He pointed to the left, where a triangular rock pinnacle covered with snow rose sharply from the wide snow field. Otsuka had been right when he had advised me earlier to take a few rock and ice pitons along. It seemed to us that we had taken a round-about way.

Again, this is nothing like the route we experienced. On the left you can see a view looking up the third plateau, with the third snow bank above, leading directly up to Manaslu’s summit crown.

As you can, there is no danger of taking a round-about way in clear conditions. The route does not undulate gently; it simply goes straight up the snow slope. At no point do two white peaks appear on the right, and nor does a rock pinnacle which requires rock and ice pitons rise on the left. I can only account for this by assuming they must have been working their way along an undulating ridge to the right of the plateau in this photo, a ridge that does indeed undulate and wind left and right when there is much less snow. The rock pinnacle is probably the snow bank and summit crown seen in these drier conditions.

They reached the top of third plateau, where Imanishi described the snow bank which followed as a “sharp snow ridge”. At this point they still believed the rock pinnacle above them was Manaslu’s summit. They were to be disappointed:

“We slowly approached the rock pinnacle. One more step, then I called to Gyaltsen ‘Good Luck!’ and he looked at me and smiled. However, somehow the peak disappeared and another appeared behind it. One moment we were on a shelf of snow, and the next it became a steep slope.”

Now they found themselves on a narrow corniced ridge which they climbed by cutting steps the size of buckets in the snow above them. They worked their way to the right of the ridge, and then:

“At last I thought I had reached the top, but then up bobbed a sharp triangular pinnacle. This really was the summit … On the side leading down to the Marsyangdi I discovered a snow slope that looked as if it might lead to the summit. At last my mind was put at rest, and when I looked at the summit once more a way of approach opened. I found we could climb down the deep gully.”

At seems clear from this description the pair had been working their way up, down and around a series of smaller summits. At the penultimate one they looked down a deep gap which divided it from the true summit. Imanishi described their final few steps onto the summit:

“The peak of this Kambunge [mountain god] now stood some 10m in front of me. The snow had been blown from its peak for about 20m down and the rock was visible. Secured by Gyaltsen, I climbed down the gap, then slowly ascended the triangle, driving an ice piton into the rock at 12.30.”

People often talk about Manaslu having a fore-summit, but this is misleading, at least to most people who have climbed the mountain more recently (my mate Bunter being an obvious exception). This is what we saw when we reached the top of the third snow bank.

On the summit crown, with the main summit at the back (Photo: Pierre Godof)

On the summit crown, with the main summit at the back (Photo: Pierre Godof)

I call it Manaslu’s summit crown. As you can see, there are indeed a series of fore-summits leading to the true summit at the far end, but nobody in their right mind would climb up and over them these days, when there’s an easy traverse across snow to the left of them.

I assume Imanishi and Gyaltsen were no fools. They would only have taken this route if the alternative was more difficult. The easy path in snow beside the fore-summits must have been very different in the drier conditions.

So what is the summit of Manaslu really like? You will get a different answer depending on who you ask.

By chance there are teams on Manaslu right now, and I have been following the expedition dispatches from my old friends at Altitude Junkies, whom I climbed with in 2011. In their team is the respected mountaineering blogger Alan Arnette, who has been describing much drier conditions this year. Who knows, perhaps they will even get to see the stripy rock tower of 1956. The team set off from base camp on their summit push on Saturday, which means if things go to plan they will reach the summit today. I’m watching with interest.

You can read more about my own ascent of Manaslu in the ebook of my expedition diary. I also summarised the expedition in a previous post. Or maybe you just want to look at the pictures.

You might also like:

Tags: | | | | | | | | | | |

| << Return to blog home

Please help me raise money for education in Nepal ...

sponsor me for CHANCEIn my spare time I am a trustee of CHANCE, a UK charity who strive to give young people in Nepal better opportunities in life by providing teacher training, and inspiring them to take part in the Duke of Edinburgh's International Award.

If you enjoy this blog it would be fantastic if you can give me a big thumbs up by making a donation. You can also help by getting sponsored for an event or travelling to Nepal with their partner trekking agency. Here are the other ways you can help.

If you prefer not to then that's OK too. I enjoy going on expeditions and writing the blog, and will continue to do both of them anyway.

Comments (2)

  1. Matt said:

    Interesting reading as always Mark!

  2. John Quillen said:

    Well done. As they say you can never climb the same mountain twice!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lively discussion is welcome, but if you think your comment might offend please read the commenting guidelines before posting.

Enter your email address

Latest comments

  1. “Fascinating story and incredible photos - glad to read the debunking began early on. ”

  2. “That's a smart answer to a tricky qusoiten ”

  3. “hello Mark, you come across as a know-it-all pompous judgmental windbag! I've never met you though, but I wouldn't recommend your blog …”

Archive

Thieves, Liars and Mountaineers by Mark Horrell, available as an ebook here